Survey reveals Solvency II doubts
01 July 2015 London
Image: Shutterstock
More than one in three insurance professionals and fund managers (36 percent) believe asset management companies are unprepared for providing the level of data their insurance clients will require under Solvency II, according to a State Street survey.
Eight percent of the 100 insurance executives and fund managers surveyed went as far as to say the felt “very unprepared”.
The survey findings also revealed that even if fund managers could provide the level of data required, 41 percent believe they would struggle to do so in a timely fashion.
Fund managers also expressed concern that there is a potential for strategic positions being “leaked”.
Some 31 percent said they thought that alternative fund managers would be “very reluctant” to share important and commercial data with insurers under Solvency II for this reason, and a further 56 percent thought they would be “slightly reluctant”.
Some 65 percent believe fund of funds could be adversely affected by Solvency II because many of their underlying managers could be reluctant to share proprietary data.
Martha Whitman, head of insurance solutions for Europe, Middle East & Africa at State Street, said: “When our clients think of Solvency II they focus on the issues facing insurers, but the challenges can be just as demanding for the fund managers who manage their investments.”
“The level of reporting and transparency required is significant. We have seen a growing number of fund managers, in addition to insurers, approach us to help address the administration burden.”
When looking at alternative asset classes, given the higher capital charge insurers will have to pay under Solvency II, 10 percent of insurance executives and fund managers surveyed predicted insurers will dramatically reduce their exposure.
To help address some of the issues, 43 percent of those surveyed expected an increase in insurers entering joint ventures to change their exposure to alternative strategies and lower their capital charges—such as replacing their fund structure with direct investments in the area of real estate for capital.
Overall, 68 percent of insurance executive and fund managers surveyed believe that the pressure of Solvency II on insurers will lead to them placing a greater focus on investment strategies that provide more predictable and uncorrelated returns.
However, 14 percent are very concerned that insurers will have a reduced appetite for risk and this, coupled with a low inflation environment, will adversely affect the ability of insurers to meet their liabilities and commitments to clients.
Eight percent of the 100 insurance executives and fund managers surveyed went as far as to say the felt “very unprepared”.
The survey findings also revealed that even if fund managers could provide the level of data required, 41 percent believe they would struggle to do so in a timely fashion.
Fund managers also expressed concern that there is a potential for strategic positions being “leaked”.
Some 31 percent said they thought that alternative fund managers would be “very reluctant” to share important and commercial data with insurers under Solvency II for this reason, and a further 56 percent thought they would be “slightly reluctant”.
Some 65 percent believe fund of funds could be adversely affected by Solvency II because many of their underlying managers could be reluctant to share proprietary data.
Martha Whitman, head of insurance solutions for Europe, Middle East & Africa at State Street, said: “When our clients think of Solvency II they focus on the issues facing insurers, but the challenges can be just as demanding for the fund managers who manage their investments.”
“The level of reporting and transparency required is significant. We have seen a growing number of fund managers, in addition to insurers, approach us to help address the administration burden.”
When looking at alternative asset classes, given the higher capital charge insurers will have to pay under Solvency II, 10 percent of insurance executives and fund managers surveyed predicted insurers will dramatically reduce their exposure.
To help address some of the issues, 43 percent of those surveyed expected an increase in insurers entering joint ventures to change their exposure to alternative strategies and lower their capital charges—such as replacing their fund structure with direct investments in the area of real estate for capital.
Overall, 68 percent of insurance executive and fund managers surveyed believe that the pressure of Solvency II on insurers will lead to them placing a greater focus on investment strategies that provide more predictable and uncorrelated returns.
However, 14 percent are very concerned that insurers will have a reduced appetite for risk and this, coupled with a low inflation environment, will adversely affect the ability of insurers to meet their liabilities and commitments to clients.
NO FEE, NO RISK
100% ON RETURNS If you invest in only one asset servicing news source this year, make sure it is your free subscription to Asset Servicing Times
100% ON RETURNS If you invest in only one asset servicing news source this year, make sure it is your free subscription to Asset Servicing Times
